CO129-359 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [12] — Page 46

„Jániai ratosqen) denlega esgraɗo

O F

No. 2.

«Kodrædqsë to yab vizes edd vabar? no Jait

.I

silabai rodomteni .m.q 8 hrs .m.q " to ernost nút mented „PORL

[{${@@T) $ulnźnih awo aid midałw "on youb no necit dont new orbe

ham O* .Bol diw of reavor gal(lawb alarmo nadne hib (dobrtain

Lile and taqiens bus to nolaɛtrewq nga znoriete denné? 1845 za

.Bennor bias stið “o užm: qitono writ to

The Honourable

sir,

The Colonial Secretary.

CO

951

Sanitary Board:Office,

BAR & JAN 10. 24th. October, 1909′′

*££uftwafro/ galvas sd-JaX todosquni sast

*

.II

bit bisnarots doen?? Jam? ‚ñà .ok mavosť gallløvd erið bere?ma

.ok enrod to fraquono solo hra rusmow bale sa a am? “How ono Juq

,6ombinly Isgo@rey to “art mi domnda tax? O#

VILUVAÏM gaivad sunim”” notɔaqual taf?

.III

hip htonian 1 0% neworl hornさmo

# at nasfy to wisy ono yaldsend yď dɛvor hime odd að eyamuh ob

.20oft barot¬ adè no moor

In answer to the charges laid against ne,

respectfully beg to submit that there is a foundation of truth

in them, but that the information laid against me by the com-

-plainanta has been exaggerated.

I

On the date on which my delinquency is

alleged to have occurred I had already met them, and invited

them to r house: the invitation was accepted and I entertained

them there.

6.98 art noented azah oso aris no tai?

.VI

(not3s32 miljootataid adó roðna bib edstaff! tornaqeni æteraz!

doszab vtinoriaus duodékw hib ham głub no gaisd 201 asɗayatqie”

stloos tiw od vtub digim no selinoo “atvoren damo sɗá be eno

to sybe(wori ede suodziw seison reqʊng aid sort gnik ma? 13 oft

mot mid o**t bas nolta¿ð hinn aɖė to anseio at rotosqɛnt aris

.doenth Jast Oa .of of neɛotwuq #raving owo al

‚etio* .D .C .* (.8?)

さ

t

*

I have been on friendly terms with the

complainants for ame years, and as a matter of fact they hare visited me at my house elsewhere, to say nothing of the friend- -ly reception I have received when officially calling at their

houses, which must have been many times during the last five

or six years.

With respect to what happened on the evening

in question I must admit that I had been entertained by several

friends during the latter part of the afternoon, and on going through East Street, and passing complafanta houses thought I would call upon them. I visited both the shop at No. 40 and the

family house at No. 45 opposite, the inmates of both places

being well known to me.

If by going into these houses, the people,

knowing my official posizion, thought I intended to annoy then,

it was certainly not ry wish or intention.

I wish to state again I considered these

people friendly to me, and if I was somewhat forceful in r

behaviour I sincerely regret it.